rss

TIOBE Index for July 2018

July Headline: TypeScript continues to rise

Last month we announced that TypeScript entered the TIOBE index top 100 for the first time. TypeScript appears to keep growing in popularity. This month it entered the top 50. TypeScript is slowly becoming the new and improved JavaScript. One of the trends that was not mentioned in my last post is the rising popularity of Angular. Angular is the successor of AngularJS. The latter platform was based on JavaScript, but the new Angular is completely focusing on TypeScript. The other large JavaScript platform, React, didn't adopt TypeScript yet, but this seems to be a matter of time. Other interesting moves in the TIOBE index this month are: Objective-C is back in the top 10 (probably only temporarily), Lua jumped from position 36 to 25, F# leaped 19 places to position 36 and Haskell is back in the top 50 at position 44.

IMPORTANT NOTE. SQL has been added again to the TIOBE index since February 2018. The reason for this is that SQL appears to be Turing complete. As a consequence, there is no recent history for the language and thus it might seem that the SQL language is rising very fast. This is not the case.

The TIOBE Programming Community index is an indicator of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. Popular search engines such as Google, Bing, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Amazon, YouTube and Baidu are used to calculate the ratings. It is important to note that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written.

The index can be used to check whether your programming skills are still up to date or to make a strategic decision about what programming language should be adopted when starting to build a new software system. The definition of the TIOBE index can be found here.

Jul 2018 Jul 2017 Change Programming Language Ratings Change
11Java16.139%+2.37%
22C14.662%+7.34%
33C++7.615%+2.04%
44Python6.361%+2.82%
57changeVisual Basic .NET4.247%+1.20%
65changeC#3.795%+0.28%
76changePHP2.832%-0.26%
88JavaScript2.831%+0.22%
9-changeSQL2.334%+2.33%
1018changeObjective-C1.453%-0.44%
1112changeSwift1.412%-0.84%
1213changeRuby1.203%-1.05%
1314changeAssembly language1.154%-1.09%
1415changeR1.150%-0.95%
1517changeMATLAB1.130%-0.88%
169changeDelphi/Object Pascal1.109%-1.38%
1711changePerl1.101%-1.23%
1810changeGo0.969%-1.39%
1916changeVisual Basic0.885%-1.21%
2020PL/SQL0.704%-0.84%


Other programming languages

The complete top 50 of programming languages is listed below. This overview is published unofficially, because it could be the case that we missed a language. If you have the impression there is a programming language lacking, please notify us at tpci@tiobe.com. Please also check the overview of all programming languages that we monitor.

PositionProgramming LanguageRatings
21Scratch0.669%
22SAS0.613%
23D0.596%
24Dart0.579%
25Lua0.470%
26Scala0.459%
27Apex0.459%
28Transact-SQL0.448%
29Ada0.435%
30Lisp0.426%
31COBOL0.425%
32ABAP0.413%
33OpenCL0.380%
34Fortran0.366%
35LabVIEW0.342%
36F#0.340%
37Bash0.308%
38Clojure0.277%
39Rust0.271%
40Logo0.253%
41(Visual) FoxPro0.242%
42Tcl0.233%
43Awk0.227%
44Haskell0.226%
45Prolog0.220%
46Scheme0.202%
47NXT-G0.201%
48Kotlin0.198%
49Erlang0.185%
50TypeScript0.175%

The Next 50 Programming Languages

The following list of languages denotes #51 to #100. Since the differences are relatively small, the programming languages are only listed (in alphabetical order).

  • ABC, ActionScript, Alice, Applescript, Bourne shell, C shell, CFML, Chapel, CL (OS/400), Common Lisp, Crystal, Elixir, Elm, Euphoria, Forth, Groovy, Hack, Icon, IDL, Io, J, Julia, Korn shell, Ladder Logic, ML, Monkey, MOO, MQL4, MS-DOS batch, NATURAL, OCaml, Oz, PL/I, PostScript, PowerShell, Pure Data, Q, Racket, REXX, RPG, S-PLUS, Smalltalk, Snap!, SPARK, SPSS, Standard ML, Vala/Genie, VBScript, Verilog, VHDL


This Month's Changes in the Index

This month the following changes have been made to the definition of the index:

  • Brad Chamberlain proposed to add the Chapel programming language to the index. The language entered the top 100 at position 97.
  • Another new language is Pony. It has been proposed by Bram Stappers. Pony debuts at position 173.
  • Isiah Meadows suggested the extra terms TS for TypeScript and crystallang for Crystal. These terms have been added.
  • There are lots of mails that still need to be processed. As soon as there is more time available your mail will be answered. Please be patient.

Very Long Term History

To see the bigger picture, please find below the positions of the top 10 programming languages of many years back. Please note that these are average positions for a period of 12 months.

Programming Language2018201320082003199819931988
Java121116--
C2122111
C++3433225
Python476112318-
C#5578---
Visual Basic .NET612-----
JavaScript7108720--
PHP8645---
Ruby99918---
R102346----
Perl12854311-
Objective-C1734053---
Ada27181814953
Fortran302520126315
Lisp31111513762

Programming Language Hall of Fame

The hall of fame listing all "Programming Language of the Year" award winners is shown below. The award is given to the programming language that has the highest rise in ratings in a year.

YearWinner
2017medal C
2016medal Go
2015medal Java
2014medal JavaScript
2013medal Transact-SQL
2012medal Objective-C
2011medal Objective-C
2010medal Python
2009medal Go
2008medal C
2007medal Python
2006medal Ruby
2005medal Java
2004medal PHP
2003medal C++


Bugs & Change Requests

This is the top 5 of most requested changes and bugs. If you have any suggestions how to improve the index don't hesitate to send an e-mail to tpci@tiobe.com.

  1. Apart from "<language> programming", also other queries such as "programming with <language>", "<language> development" and "<language> coding" should be tried out.
  2. Add queries for other natural languages (apart from English). The idea is to start with the Chinese search engine Baidu. This has been implemented partially and will be completed the next few months.
  3. Add a list of all search term requests that have been rejected. This is to minimize the number of recurring mails about Rails, JQuery, JSP, etc.
  4. Start a TIOBE index for databases, software configuration management systems and application frameworks.
  5. Some search engines allow to query pages that have been added last year. The TIOBE index should only track those recently added pages.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • Q: Am I allowed to show the TIOBE index in my weblog/presentation/publication?

    A: Yes, the only condition is to refer to its original source "www.tiobe.com".

  • Q: How may I nominate a new language to be added to the TIOBE index?

    A: If a language meets the criteria of being listed (i.e. it is Turing complete and has an own Wikipedia entry that indicates that it concerns a programming language) and it is sufficiently popular (more than 5,000 hits for +"<language> programming" for Google), then please write an e-mail to tpci@tiobe.com.

  • Q: I would like to have the complete data set of the TIOBE index. Is this possible?

    A: We spent a lot of effort to obtain all the data and keep the TIOBE index up to date. In order to compensate a bit for this, we ask a fee of 5,000 US$ for the complete data set. The data set runs from June 2001 till today. It started with 25 languages back in 2001, and now measures more than 150 languages once a month. The data are available in comma separated format. Please contact sales@tiobe.com for more information.

  • Q: Why is the maximum taken to calculate the ranking for a grouping, why not the sum?

    A: Well, you can do it either way and both are wrong. If you take the sum, then you get the intersection twice. If you take the max, then you miss the difference. Which one to choose? Suppose somebody comes up with a new search term that is 10% of the original. If you take the max, nothing changes. If you take the sum then the ratings will rise 10%. So taking the sum will be an incentive for some to come up with all kinds of obscure terms for a language. That's why we decided to take the max.

    The proper way to solve this is is of course to take the sum and subtract the intersection. This will give rise to an explosion of extra queries that must be performed. Suppose a language has a grouping of 15 terms, then you have to perform 32,768 queries (all combinations of intersections). So this seems not possible either... If somebody has a solution for this, please let us know.

  • Q: What happened to Java in April 2004? Did you change your methodology?

    A: No, we did not change our methodology at that time. Google changed its methodology. They performed a general sweep action to get rid of all kinds of web sites that had been pushed up. As a consequence, there was a huge drop for languages such as Java and C++. In order to minimize such fluctuations in the future, we added two more search engines (MSN and Yahoo) a few months after this incident.