rss

TIOBE Index for April 2020

April Headline: Scratch enters the TIOBE index top 20

Graphical block-based programming language Scratch has entered the TIOBE index top 20. At first sight this might seem a bit strange for a programming language that is designed to teach children how to program. But if you take into account that there are in total more than 50 million projects "written" in Scratch and each month 1 million new Scratch projects are added, it can't be denied any more that Scratch is popular. Since computers are getting more and more an integral part of life, it is actually quite logical that languages to teach children programming are getting popular. Some years ago there was competition between Scratch and Alice which language would become the new "Logo" programming language of the modern ages. Alice is now at position #90 of the TIOBE index so it seems clear who has won. Possible reasons why this happened is that Scratch is easier to learn (a critical success factor in this field) and Scratch is sponsored by companies such as Google and Intel. - Paul Jansen CEO TIOBE Software

The TIOBE Programming Community index is an indicator of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. Popular search engines such as Google, Bing, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Amazon, YouTube and Baidu are used to calculate the ratings. It is important to note that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written.

The index can be used to check whether your programming skills are still up to date or to make a strategic decision about what programming language should be adopted when starting to build a new software system. The definition of the TIOBE index can be found here.

Apr 2020 Apr 2019 Change Programming Language Ratings Change
11Java16.73%+1.69%
22C16.72%+2.64%
34changePython9.31%+1.15%
43changeC++6.78%-2.06%
56changeC#4.74%+1.23%
65changeVisual Basic4.72%-1.07%
77JavaScript2.38%-0.12%
89changePHP2.37%+0.13%
98changeSQL2.17%-0.10%
1016changeR1.54%+0.35%
1119changeSwift1.52%+0.54%
1218changeGo1.36%+0.35%
1313Ruby1.25%-0.02%
1410changeAssembly language1.16%-0.55%
1522changePL/SQL1.05%+0.26%
1614changePerl0.97%-0.30%
1711changeObjective-C0.94%-0.57%
1812changeMATLAB0.93%-0.36%
1917changeClassic Visual Basic0.83%-0.23%
2027changeScratch0.77%+0.28%


Other programming languages

The complete top 50 of programming languages is listed below. This overview is published unofficially, because it could be the case that we missed a language. If you have the impression there is a programming language lacking, please notify us at tpci@tiobe.com. Please also check the overview of all programming languages that we monitor.

PositionProgramming LanguageRatings
21SAS0.73%
22Delphi0.70%
23Dart0.65%
24Transact-SQL0.54%
25D0.54%
26COBOL0.52%
27Rust0.52%
28Scala0.49%
29ABAP0.44%
30Kotlin0.41%
31Logo0.35%
32Lisp0.34%
33F#0.34%
34Fortran0.33%
35Lua0.33%
36Ada0.28%
37Prolog0.26%
38VBScript0.25%
39LabVIEW0.25%
40Apex0.23%
41Haskell0.23%
42TypeScript0.21%
43PowerShell0.21%
44ML0.20%
45RPG0.19%
46Scheme0.19%
47Erlang0.18%
48Groovy0.18%
49Bash0.18%
50Julia0.17%

The Next 50 Programming Languages

The following list of languages denotes #51 to #100. Since the differences are relatively small, the programming languages are only listed (in alphabetical order).

  • (Visual) FoxPro, ABC, ActionScript, Alice, Arc, ATLAS, Awk, bc, Bourne shell, C shell, CL (OS/400), Clojure, Common Lisp, Crystal, cT, Elixir, Forth, Hack, Icon, Inform, Io, J, Korn shell, Ladder Logic, LiveCode, Maple, Mercury, MQL4, NATURAL, Object Pascal, OCaml, OpenCL, OpenEdge ABL, Oz, PL/I, PostScript, Programming Without Coding Technology, Pure Data, Q, Red, Ring, S, Smalltalk, Solidity, SPARK, Tcl, Vala/Genie, Verilog, VHDL, Whitespace


This Month's Changes in the Index

This month the following changes have been made to the definition of the index:

  • Ian pointed out that Delphi and Object Pascal have separate Wikipedia pages so they should also have different TIOBE index entries. As of this month Delphi and Object Pascal are split. Delphi is at position #22 and Object Pascal at position #73.
  • Erel Uziel suggested to add the programming language B4X to the index. B4X meets all criteria, so it has been added. B4X debuts at position #118.
  • So far there were 2 Visual Basic entries in the TIOBE index: "Visual Basic .NET" and "Visual Basic". The first one is the current Microsoft implementation and the second one the old one. If somebody is referring to Visual Basic nowadays most of the time the new Visual Basic is meant. Utibe Udoh asked us to make this clear to avoid confusion. So from now on "Visual Basic .NET" is called "Visual Basic" and the old entry "Visual Basic" is renamed to "Classic Visual Basic".
  • There are lots of mails that still need to be processed. As soon as there is more time available your mail will be answered. Please be patient.

Very Long Term History

To see the bigger picture, please find below the positions of the top 10 programming languages of many years back. Please note that these are average positions for a period of 12 months.

Programming Language20202015201020052000199519901985
Java12123---
C21211211
Python37662321--
C++44432139
C#55579---
JavaScript68886---
PHP763425---
SQL8--96----
Swift9181------
Ruby101192331---
Objective-C1231537----
Lisp272114138562
Fortran29282114164212
Ada3426241515673
Pascal23513125313385

Programming Language Hall of Fame

The hall of fame listing all "Programming Language of the Year" award winners is shown below. The award is given to the programming language that has the highest rise in ratings in a year.

YearWinner
2019medal C
2018medal Python
2017medal C
2016medal Go
2015medal Java
2014medal JavaScript
2013medal Transact-SQL
2012medal Objective-C
2011medal Objective-C
2010medal Python
2009medal Go
2008medal C
2007medal Python
2006medal Ruby
2005medal Java
2004medal PHP
2003medal C++


Bugs & Change Requests

This is the top 5 of most requested changes and bugs. If you have any suggestions how to improve the index don't hesitate to send an e-mail to tpci@tiobe.com.

  1. Apart from "<language> programming", also other queries such as "programming with <language>", "<language> development" and "<language> coding" should be tried out.
  2. Add queries for other natural languages (apart from English). The idea is to start with the Chinese search engine Baidu. This has been implemented partially and will be completed the next few months.
  3. Add a list of all search term requests that have been rejected. This is to minimize the number of recurring mails about Rails, JQuery, JSP, etc.
  4. Start a TIOBE index for databases, software configuration management systems and application frameworks.
  5. Some search engines allow to query pages that have been added last year. The TIOBE index should only track those recently added pages.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • Q: Am I allowed to show the TIOBE index in my weblog/presentation/publication?

    A: Yes, the only condition is to refer to its original source "www.tiobe.com".

  • Q: How may I nominate a new language to be added to the TIOBE index?

    A: If a language meets the criteria of being listed (i.e. it is Turing complete and has an own Wikipedia entry that indicates that it concerns a programming language) and it is sufficiently popular (more than 5,000 hits for +"<language> programming" for Google), then please write an e-mail to tpci@tiobe.com.

  • Q: I would like to have the complete data set of the TIOBE index. Is this possible?

    A: We spent a lot of effort to obtain all the data and keep the TIOBE index up to date. In order to compensate a bit for this, we ask a fee of 5,000 US$ for the complete data set. The data set runs from June 2001 till today. It started with 25 languages back in 2001, and now measures more than 150 languages once a month. The data are available in comma separated format. Please contact sales@tiobe.com for more information.

  • Q: Why is the maximum taken to calculate the ranking for a grouping, why not the sum?

    A: Well, you can do it either way and both are wrong. If you take the sum, then you get the intersection twice. If you take the max, then you miss the difference. Which one to choose? Suppose somebody comes up with a new search term that is 10% of the original. If you take the max, nothing changes. If you take the sum then the ratings will rise 10%. So taking the sum will be an incentive for some to come up with all kinds of obscure terms for a language. That's why we decided to take the max.

    The proper way to solve this is is of course to take the sum and subtract the intersection. This will give rise to an explosion of extra queries that must be performed. Suppose a language has a grouping of 15 terms, then you have to perform 32,768 queries (all combinations of intersections). So this seems not possible either... If somebody has a solution for this, please let us know.

  • Q: What happened to Java in April 2004? Did you change your methodology?

    A: No, we did not change our methodology at that time. Google changed its methodology. They performed a general sweep action to get rid of all kinds of web sites that had been pushed up. As a consequence, there was a huge drop for languages such as Java and C++. In order to minimize such fluctuations in the future, we added two more search engines (MSN and Yahoo) a few months after this incident.